Spy On Your Competitors’ Citation Profiles

Matt McGee discovered an interesting tool for finding your competitors’ citations, and it’s not a bad one.  The folks over at Ontolo have put together an automated version of their citation tracking by phone number method.  Basically, the way it works is like this – the phone number is the one absolutely unique element of any business.  A company name could be repeated, or even an address in an office building.  But by Googling a phone number, you’re guaranteed relevant results for the business you’re searching for.  In fact, when you Google a phone number, the results are a complete listing of that business’s online presence…otherwise known around here as a complete citation record.

The tool automates this process, and generates a list of unique domains, sorted by the frequency they show up in the citation profiles of the 7-pack listings.  So now you just need to duplicate your competitors’ efforts and add a few of your own, and you’re all set!

The only additional feature I wish for would be a way to go deeper than just the 7-pack.  Why not show citations for the top 20 (or 200) businesses?

Keeping Your Review Record Healthy and Spread Out

While citations are important for local search, reviews shouldn’t be neglected.  David Mihm has his theory of citations being the new links, and I’d like to add a corollary – reviews are the new link profile of the sites linking to you (it’s a bit of a mouthful, but it works).  In other words, just like a site that has a hundred sites linking to it still won’t rank well if none of those sites have links to them, a citation in Google Places isn’t as valuable as a citation that comes with reviews, showing that the citation represents an active online presence for that business.

It’s not a perfect rule, especially considering that some citation sources don’t have the possibility of reviews at all, and also the fact that a citation without reviews is still a much more powerful ranking factor compared to a link from a linkless site.  But it’s a pretty good rule of thumb.  Basically – you want reviews.

Show Google a healthy Review Profile:

Step 1: Look at the other businesses in your sector that are ranking well in Google Maps.  Check out the reviews they have on other sites, and pay attention to what’s being pulled in by Google Places.  For example, if you’ve got a restaurant, it’s important to have good reviews on Yelp, UrbanSpoon, and Zagat.  Add TripAdvisor to that list if you service the tourists.   These are the review sites that you need to pump your reviews into.

Step 2: Create a review hub page on your site.  It should be located at yoursite.com/reviews.  The hub page should be a series of links to other sites that you have profiles on  - the list you created back in Step 1.  Order some business cards with the express intent of giving them to customers AFTER you’ve done the work for them.  If you’re a restaurant, you can put it with the check.  The business card should have a short message about your business, some contact information if they ever need you again, and most importantly, ask the customer to leave a comment or a review on yoursite.com/reviews.

If you have your clients’ email addresses, drop them a line soon after you do business with a link directly to that page.  The point is, you want to be driving traffic to that specific page of your website.  As time goes by, change the order of the links, or add or remove different sites as your review profile needs curating.  If you have 100 reviews on UrbanSpoon but none on Zagat, move it down the list.

Step 3 (optional): For the programming ninjas out there, set up a redirect on yoursite.com/reviews to your citations that you want to generate reviews for.  You can stagger the redirects so that not everybody is redirected to the same site.  For restaurants, try something like 40% Yelp, 30% UrbanSpoon, 15% Zagat, and another 15% to something local.  Pay attention to how your review profile develops, and adjust the redirects accordingly.

If you do this right, you’ll soon be seeing a nice healthy review profile growing across a diverse field of sites.  Good luck!

Share

Weekly Local Search Roundup – August 6, 2010

I think it’s probably a good idea to do these roundups every week, and I’m certainly going to try.  I plan on doing these every Thursday, but got a little distracted yesterday by the Jerusalem Wine Festival, so my inaugural Weekly Local Search Roundup is going to have to be a day late, and slightly hung over.

The biggest news this week has probably been Google Places’ newest feature:  Respond to Reviews.

Mike Blumenthal breaks the news first.

Miriam Ellis is thrilled at the good news she can now share with her clients (as am I!)

David Mihm claims that this change propels Google Places down a Facebook Fan Page intercept path, and promises an in depth future post on this – which I’m definitely looking forward to.

Andrew Shotland also weighs in on the impact Facebook is starting to have on Local Search marketing strategies, and writes up a great in-depth look at comScore’s 2010 stats.

Matt McGee welcomes the new Google Small Business Blog, something that’s been a long time in coming.

Perhaps the most overrated news this week (and I also jumped on that bandwagon) is the fact that Google will now be calling local businesses to confirm location and DBA details.  A closer look at Google’s message is that this is only relevant to verifying community edits, making this not that big a deal at all (it’s not a broad reverification campaign), but I’ll be keeping an eye on this story to see how it develops.

Share

Google Places: Respond to Reviews Feature Could Be Better

Responding to reviews is a critical feature for reputation management, and now Google lets you do precisely that.  The benefits are enormous – business owners finally have a voice to combat malicious or even fake reviews, and even just say thanks to great reviews.

Here are a few features I hope we’ll see added to this one:

The response is basically a comment on the review.  Why not allow anybody to comment on the review, ala Facebook style?  It’s basically a more informative alternative to the “Was this review helpful?” feature Google Places has already had for a while.

Responding to reviews should be an option that’s available to all reviews, pulled from all sites.  Not just the reviews generated on the company’s Place Page!  C’mon Google, this one’s a no brainer.  If reviews on InsiderPages or Yelp are important enough to be shown on the Place Place, why should they be treated any differently re: responding?

Share

comScore Data: Mobile-Local Search Up

Today, Andrew Shotland discusses the comScore data recently released.  The data segments the growth in the mobile-local directory sphere from March 2009 to March 2010.

Highlights:

While mobile users overall grew by 10%, mobile-local directories saw a 14% rise in traffic, marking over 17 million visitors.

There was a 42% rise in the visitors using smartphone apps, as opposed to a traditional mobile browser.

Traffic originating from search engines (let’s face it, Google, which has a near 100% monopoly in the mobile search engine market) grew three points, up to 44%.  I’m curious to see where this number will be a year from now.  Google has been aggressively pushing Google Places as an alternative to traditional IYP sites, and it’s only a matter of time before that push makes its way to mobile search.

To survive, I believe IYPs need to focus on apps (which they’ve been doing, according to this data) and direct referrals (which they haven’t so much, seeing a relatively small rise of 14% – they need to see more), and depend less on search engine traffic, which can be intercepted by Google at any moment.

Share

Checkins: A New Google Places Ranking Factor?

Google has just announced that they’re opening up their API to developers, encouraging checkin-type apps to link up with Google Places.  This is a great move, that can 1) Bring additional focus to Google Places, encouraging both greater customer interaction, as well as increased SMB owner awareness of Google Places, something Google has been struggling with (though GetListed.org has been a positive force on this issue), and 2) Provide Google with an additional ranking factor in the Local SERPs.

A couple of things that bear mentioning:

The possibility of Google using checkins as a ranking factor has already been discussed over at David Mihm’s 2010 Local Search Ranking Factors – with a pretty high agreement of its low importance, though everyone seems to be in consensus that it’s poised to be big in 2011.  This could be the start of that.

Google doesn’t need to be successful with this before incorporating checkins into their local ranking algorithm.  Why can’t they just use FourSquare’s data until (if ever) their own checkin system can take over?  In fact – does anyone know for sure that they aren’t already?

Share

Four Types of Google Places Citations

We all know SEO is all about the links.  More than any other factor, an absence of links translates into an effective absence of ranking, while a large quantity of quality links usually translates into a site that ranks well.

Local SEO is a little different – it’s not so much the links, it’s the citations that show up in Google Places.  If you’ve been in business for a while, your business identity is probably already listed on websites across the web, without you even knowing.  If you own a pizza shop, a tourist who stopped in for a bite may have blogged about how good (or bad) the pizza is.  If she mentioned your business name, that’s a citation.  You may have an entry in your hometown’s chamber of commerce – that’s a good citation as well.

Your identity as a business is made up of several small components. While your phone number, your address, and your company name are the most frequently discussed citations, a true citation could have up to a dozen or more factors – website address, email address, fax number, cell number, business license number, contact name, and several others.

All else being equal (and it never is), a business with 10 citations will outrank a business with 5 citations of equal strength. A citation’s strength is determined these four factors.

1)      Consistency with other citations. This is why, if your business has multiple phone numbers, only one should be used on the web.  Make sure all listings use the same address, unless you have multiple locations – in that case, create a separate Google Places listing for each address, and each address should have its own unique phone number, and if possible, unique “contact us” or “store location” page on your website.  If you have two stores named “Ray’s Pizza,” then you should call them “Ray’s Pizza on 5th Avenue,” or “Ray’s Pizza Downtown”

2)      Comprehensiveness of the citations.  A citation with a company name, phone number, and address, is better than name and phone number alone, and a citation with a fax number, website, and hours of operation is even better.  The more information, the better, just make sure you don’t cross rule #1 – consistency.

3)      Industry relevancy of the citation website.  Sure, InsiderPages, CitySearch and Yelp are all great citation building sites.  And you should definitely put in the time and resources to building citations from these and other IYP sites (especially because they’re great sources for reviews – more on that some other time).  But this isn’t going to help you stand out from the crowd.  I can pretty much guarantee that the 7 businesses currently dominating the top ten are already listed on those sites.  What you need to do is find as many citation sources as possible that are industry relevant – if you’re a pizza shop, get listed on restaurant review sites, or pizza specific sites, if possible.  Plumbers can usually get listed on their local plumber’s union website, or one of many find a plumber type sites that also offer free listings.

4)      Local relevancy of the citation website.  This is just as important as #3.  If your business is located in Wichita, find business directories that focus on Wichita.  If you’re in New York, get listed in New York business directories.  As a bonus, combine rules #3 and #4 – getting listed in a NY directory of pizza shops could give your listing a huge boost.

This is enough to get you started.  I’ll try to follow up on this with another article on how to find good citations.  You can also read David Mihm’s slightly dated, though still excellent Why Citation is the New Link.  Have I missed anything?

Share

Google Places: The Problem With Tags

One of the great things about Google’s Adwords program is how its auction based pricing system automatically sets the appropriate pricing according to both the keyword itself, and the market the campaign is targeting.  The system is what makes a keyword like bikini a more expensive cost per click in Miami than it is in Anchorage, and mesothelioma a more expensive keyword than pizza.  This is the sort of common-sense approach Google is famous for, and part of what makes them so great.

Google’s recent “Place Tags” rollout seems to fly against pretty much everything they must have learned from AdWords – a tag costs $25, no matter where the market is, what the keyword is, how many impressions there are, and how many clicks there are.  Should a place tag for a listing that ranks one the first page for Plastic Surgeon in Beverly Hills really cost as much as Babysitter in Knoxville, TN?  I imagine the $25/months gets eaten up even if Doc Hollywood only gets one new patient out of his listing, but how many babysitting jobs does little Sally need to go on before that $25 becomes a valid investment – one that repeats month after month?  If Google is serious about their new local-weighted SERPs layout, then it’s a question that takes on a greater importance.

Google must know that their flat price per tag policy is flawed – what are they planning?  Pricing based on industry?  Location?  A per-click model?

Share

What is Local SEO, and Why is it Important?

If you’re reading this blog, you’re probably familiar with at least the basic concept of Search Engine Optimization (SEO).  SEO includes a combination of both on-page and off-page techniques to best optimize a page or site to appear as high as possible in search engine results pages (SERPs) for targeted keywords.  These techniques have been around (though they constantly evolve) since the late ’90s, and are essential to any site that plans on generating any amount of income online.

Local SEO refers simply to optimization techniques for achieving high rankings on the search engines’ local or maps results pages (maps.google.com or local.yahoo.com, for example), or on specific local business search engines, usually referred to as Internet Yellow Pages (IYPs), such as insiderpages.com, or yelp.com.

Until a few years ago, being #1 on a maps results pages didn’t necessarily mean so much to a business – search traffic volume on those sites, including those owned or incorporated into the major search engines has always been negligible compared to the actual search engines themselves.  This all changed with what’s known as Universal Results.

Universal Results means that while Google may have it’s own 1-10 ranking for a keyword phrase (let’s say Plumber Miami), if it detects local intent (Miami), it will bump down the number one result in favor of the top 7 (or 1 or 2 or 3) results taken from Google Maps.  This means that the value of being anywhere in the top 7 maps results is now higher than being even the #1 result in traditional SEO.

Plumbers in Miami

Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.